Selling Music Is A Waste Of Time

Comments

The cost of CD's and more so Vinyl became so obscene the Labels shot themselves in the foot. As a non-superstar DJ it was becoming a cost to be a club/bar/pub dj because the amount of cash spent on records and cd's was far more than than the earnings. The future is on-line maybe, the key is cost and the cost has to come down, the price wars have already begun and where they will end will be interesting to see. DJ's are the biggest revenue clients for the industry by a million miles.
I found you under recent posts on the music page. That's why a strange person is commenting you.

People who download music I've noticed are usually the biggest music fans I know, often having huge record or CD collections. Sometimes things are just out of print or hard to find or prohibitively expensive in legit formats. So this really makes sense to me. Thankfully, I think the music industry is, for the most part, done suing its customers. It was a PR disaster for them and they know it as well as anyone.

As for artists giving their music away, I'm all for it and I'm glad to see bigger names who don't need to do that doing it in various forms. The thing is, though, that a lot of people are missing the point when they say what works for Trent Reznor and Mike Skinner might not work for the average underground musician. Trent Reznor and Mike Skinner can sell music. On the other hand, at this point, I can't imagine it being an effective business model - especially for independent musicians - to not have as much of your catalog as possible available for free. Streaming at least, downloadable preferred. If you want to get people to come out to your shows, and you're not an established act, it helps everyone when you do that. It helps the promoter know what they're booking. It helps the fans to know what you sound like and what you're doing. It helps you because you'll have fans you otherwise wouldn't coming out to your shows and buying merch. Or, if you do choose to sell CD's or records, you might even have more people buying those after hearing them.

At least, I hope I'm right. Every song I've ever written is available for free in various places.
[this is good]

A very sad fact of life I guess. The internet has killed recorded music.

The very thing that we thought would give every home recorder/bedroom songwriter their big break has now cruelly snatched it away from them.

I guess the gigging artists just need to do more gigging, and the songwriter just carries on as normal promoting themselves through the old established channels?

I disagree, the internet has not killed recorded music. Artists and Producers who love to make music will keep making music and keep recording regardless of the internet and often without a care about profit either. Recording a stream from an on-line MP3 or an on-demand website is not a big deal, the quality sucks and it's no way comparable to - or a valid replacement for the CD or Vinyl bought legally. The internet on-demand sites offer us all a time and space to listen to tracks before we choose to buy and it offers artists a massive and primary medium to promote and advertise their recordings. Independent artists would rarely or just never get any plays without the internet. Old established channels are history and anyone who stays in that vein is shooting themselves ; ]

Valid points but I still can't see it.

In the days before...(I know and accept we've all got to move on) you would have radio instead of streams.

The difference there was that you eagerly waited for your song to be played, each time getting more excited before you finally decided you needed to buy, so you could hear it whenever you wanted, and play it until you got fed up.

With the free music online...even just streaming...you get to that stage without parting with cash. You can listen as many times as you like.

Even if it hasn't killed recorded music outright it's strangled most of the life out of it.

Now I'm talking purely from the perspective of a songwriter here, but I can only see the music industry getting cheaper and cheaper. Great news for consumers but rubbish for writers.

Look at Amazon. What is going to motivate/cultivate new talent when songs are being sold for so little...and can be streamed at top quality for free?

What exactly is the way forward?

The only people that are suffering are the major labels and thats just great as far as I am concerned. The label executives made millions and strangled the artists and by doing so they have tied the noose around their own necks. The profit never really got to the Artists in most cases and that £15.00 per CD never translated to more than a £ in their pockets. The future . . . cut out the middle man and sell direct for £3.00 and still that artists make more than they ever did running with the fat cat label mafia and the consumer doesn't get ripped off. Upload . . . Download = Simple
I missed a few of the points you made. The Labels and their associates at Radio stations dictated what was and what was not played. If they was not making money out of it, no plays = control. On-demand means we can choose what we listen to = freedom. I have a vast collection of vinyl and I paid for it in cold cash but I still choose to stream those tracks on-line, many others will do the same. Streaming MP3's are not top quality, far from it. An original file in Logic Studio is 100% pure, convert to MP3 and you lose 90% of the sound, then record that stream and you degrade the sound further, it's low quality and as a dj, there is no way I could or would play such a sub-standard recording whilst mixing a set in any bar or club.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Max Waves

About Me

Max Waves
Italy
electronic music composer